BS5837 Tree Survey – Sheffield S7

  1. Home
  2. Sheffield
  3. BS5837 Tree Survey – Sheffield S7

BS5837 Tree Survey & Report for Proposed Development

Service: BS5837 Arboricultural Survey & Report
Location: Disused Tennis Courts (Proposed Development Site)
Client Objective: Assess tree constraints to support a planning application


Project Summary

JCA was instructed by our client to carry out a BS5837:2012 Tree Survey and Arboricultural Report at the site of some disused tennis courts, in support of a proposed development.

The purpose of the survey was to assess the quality, condition, and planning constraints associated with the existing trees and vegetation, in line with British Standard 5837:2012 – Trees in Relation to Design, Demolition and Construction.


Tree Survey Findings

The tree survey identified a total of 10 items of vegetation, comprising:

  • 4 individual trees

  • 6 groups of trees

Each tree or group was assessed and assigned a retention category based on condition, quality, and value:

  • Category A (High quality): 3 trees and 2 groups

  • Category C (Low quality): 1 tree and 3 groups

  • Category U (Unsuitable for retention): 1 tree


Understanding Retention Categories

Category A & B Trees (High/Moderate Quality):
These trees are considered to be of high or moderate value. Their removal is generally discouraged and may be resisted by the Local Planning Authority (LPA) unless there are exceptional circumstances.

Category C Trees (Low Quality):
Trees in this category are of lower arboricultural or landscape value. Their removal is typically more acceptable in the context of development.

Category U Trees (Unsuitable for Retention):
These are dead or dying trees, or trees with limited safe life expectancy. Removal is usually recommended regardless of development plans.


Notable Tree Constraints

A group of Category U trees was identified in the centre of the site. This included:

  • 2 multiple-stemmed Goat Willow trees

  • Located at the base of a retaining wall

  • In poor condition with limited long-term viability

These trees were not considered suitable for retention and were recommended for removal.